![]() ![]() Mintsights are personalized for each user. And personalized Mintsights offer guidance and suggestions to tweak the habits and behaviors that Mint “sees” in your financial activities, in order to help you pay down debt and save more. Mint will even tell you if those subscriptions change price. Other powerful additions for 2021 include subscription monitoring, which helps you keep track of the subscriptions that seem to proliferate with every free trial. New in 2021, you can bulk-edit to make category adjustments. Mint makes setting up a budget a simple and straightforward process: Once you’ve set up your accounts, Mint takes a crack at categorizing your expenses for you. Life is complicated enough already, and you can start your new era of fiscal responsibility right now by saving yourself the $42 annual price tag for Quicken Deluxe. While Mint and Quicken have long been the top contenders for full-featured financial management for everyday finances, Mint wins as the best personal finance software by being both free and slightly simpler than Quicken. Many users love its simple, clean UI - the 2021 design refresh is getting raves - and at-a-glance financial dashboard, with net worth right there at the top. Mint is a web-based tool (with mobile apps, of course) that will help you track spending, design a budget, manage debt, set goals and combine all your accounts (including the weird ones like balloon mortgages) in a single place. On July 10, Law360 reported that the class action was moved from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York to the District Court for the Western District of Washington, where Amazon is headquartered.If you’re looking for a one-stop shop in your personal finance software and want a full-featured tool that still keeps things simple, Mint is the choice for you. The lawsuit intends to represent New York consumers charged for Audible subscriptions between Apand the date of final judgment in the litigation. The complaint alleges that even if subscribers discover the deceptive billing, Amazon will only refund fees dating back a few months. The case says that “Audible membership is not adequately disclosed to the Prime members.”Įchoing the FTC's recent complaint, the New York class action claims that Amazon makes it extremely difficult for Prime members to discontinue their Audible subscriptions once they discover improper charges. The plaintiff claims that Amazon secretly enrolls Prime members into paid Audible subscriptions and then charges them monthly fees they never approved. According to, the complaint alleges that Amazon falsely promises Amazon Prime members a free subscription to Audible. On April 26, Amazon Prime member Tracy McCarthy and her attorneys filed an 11-page case in New York alleging deceptive Amazon Prime and Audible marketing practices. NY class action over Prime, Audible marketing Law.com reported that the case was moved from Washington state court to the Federal Court for the Western District of Washington on June 20. The class action suit requests damages, restitution, declaratory relief, private and public injunctive relief and reasonable attorneys’ fees. The plaintiffs state that the renewal scheme goes against California’s Automatic Renewal Law, which requires clear disclosure of terms and affirmative consent, according to TopClassActions. They further claim that Audible does not clearly make the Audible subscription terms available and then automatically charges consumers anywhere from $7.95 to $229.50 for monthly or yearly charges on their credit or debit cards. Plaintiffs Renee Viveros and Christine Bias claim that Audible uses e-commerce tricks called "dark patterns" to cheat California consumers by automatically charging monthly or yearly subscription charges without properly disclosing the auto-renewal. CA class action over Audible subscription schemeĪccording to Law360, two California-based Audible customers sued the audiobook subsidiary of Amazon in Washington state court on June 1. In a statement, Amazon said that it disagreed with the FTC's claims but wanted to move forward. In late May, Amazon agreed to pay the agency $30 million to settle two cases alleging privacy violations involving the company's Alexa and Ring units. This is the third case the FTC has brought against Amazon since May. The lawsuit marks the FTC’s heaviest action to date against the business tactic of using psychological gimmicks to trap customers into subscriptions, CNN Business noted.Īmazon exceeded 200 million paid Prime subscribers as of 2021, collecting billions for the company's bottom line from customers who have allegedly been tricked into spending far more time and money on the service than they intended, per the CNN story. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |